This week a judge told FDA to reverse course regarding antibiotic overuse in livestock and protect the effectiveness of the medicine for humans. Action Alert!
For the past 35 years the FDA has supposedly been reviewing the routine use of antibiotics in animal feed when in fact the agency was simply sitting on its hands. Then, last December, the agency caved to pressure and quietly withdrew any attempt to require the removal of antibiotics from animal feed.
The public was outraged, and a coalition of nonprofit organizations sued FDA to force the agency to reconsider and withdraw approval for most non-therapeutic uses of penicillin and tetracycline in animal feed, unless drug makers can prove in public hearings that the drugs do not harm human health when used this way. The lawsuit was filed by the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), the Center for Science in the Public Interest, Food Animals Concerns Trust, Public Citizen, and the Union of Concerned Scientists.
Back in 1977, FDA concluded that feeding animals low doses of certain antibiotics used in human medicine, namely, penicillin and tetracyclines, could promote antibiotic-resistant bacteria capable of infecting people. Despite this conclusion—and in direct violation of laws requiring that the agency move on its findings—FDA failed to take action for the next 35 years.
“For over 35 years, FDA has sat idly on the sidelines, ” said Avinash Kar, a health attorney for the NRDC. “In that time, the overuse of antibiotics in healthy animals has skyrocketed—contributing to the rise of antibiotic-resistant bacteria that endanger human health….These drugs are intended to cure disease, not fatten pigs and chickens.”
As we reported in January, the so-called “preventive” use of antibiotics in livestock is routine and widespread—80% of all antibiotics sold in US go into farm animal feed. Factory farms use them to ward off illness in animals that are kept in overcrowded, filthy living conditions, which are a perfect environment for the spread of illness. These antibiotics are also used to promote increased growth in animals.
However, antibiotics given to animals are transferred to humans through direct contact, environmental exposure, and the consumption and handling of contaminated meat and poultry products—making humans vulnerable to antibiotic-resistant superbugs, which are now a global problem. Moreover, a study found that up to half of US meat was contaminated with antibiotic-resistant staph.
If FDA truly wanted to focus on food safety, it would address the filthy, toxic factory farm conditions rather than allowing healthy animals to be fed antibiotics preemptively.
You might also like:
Check your cosmetics and skincare ingredients...
There's a database on zerozits.com that lists the comodegenicity potential and irritancy potential for different ingredients.
A LOT of acne is caused by "non-comedogenic" products. People don't seem to realize that the FDA doesn't have a definition for non-comedogenic. I could slap non-comedogenic on ANYTHING as long as that one product itself didn't break the majority of a test population out, but that doesn't mean it won't possibly break YOU out. For example, I get the WORST acne when I use BE mineral makeup simply because of the type of sunscreen they use; other mineral makeups are fine, but because of that one sunscreen that most people don't get acne from, I do
The Global Search for Education: Austria - Ticks — Huffington Post
The standard treatment recommended for Lyme disease is 10 days with tetracycline antibiotics. In most cases, not even a follow up blood test is done after this treatment.
Kungfu Tea Xiao Ke Wan/xiao Ke Pills, Thirsty Reliever for Daibetes, Free Shipping
Health and Beauty (guangzhou zhong yi)
Garden of Life RAW Cleanse 7-Day Triple Detox Formula 1 set
Health and Beauty (AB)